Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric VS Michelin Primacy 3

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric VS Michelin Primacy 3: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric is an ultra-high performance all-season tire whereas the Michelin Primacy 3 is categorized as a grand touring summer tire. Asymmetric is made to boost the performance aspect while ignoring the durability and cost-effectiveness.

Whereas Primacy 3 is a more balanced tire with decent dry and wet traction along with high durability and extreme hydroplaning resistance. It also has a great wet subjective comfort to offer.

Comparing Goodyear Eagle and Primacy 3

Asymmetric has four circumferential grooves dividing its tread into five segments asymmetrically. Two of which are shoulder columns bordering three ribs in between them. Its shoulders feature a distinctive design on both inboard and outboard sides with the outboard having smaller blocks formed by lateral grooves while the inward has bigger blocks with two half lateral grooves engraved on each. The lateral grooves of both shoulders open into their respective circumferential grooves. Small notches are available on the central and outboard ribs which only reach up to the center. All the ribs are shoulders have plentiful sipes available on them.

Primacy 3 has a symmetrical tread pattern with the five-pitch design having four circumferential grooves, two of which are wide while the other two are comparatively narrower. It has two tread block columns and one central rib along with inner and outer shoulders. Its shoulders are formed by the lateral grooves but don’t open into their respective circumferential grooves. The tread block columns are formed by sipes running through them, they are also present on the central rib almost reaching up to the border. However, its shoulders lack any proper sipes.

Grip Comparison

The Asymmetric boasts a larger contact patch thanks to its three ribs, which improves on-road traction. A greater grip guarantees a shorter braking distance as well as improved acceleration. As a result, this tire has a greater on-road dry grip than its competition. In wet circumstances, however, this tire’s larger contact patch and full depth sipes allow it to perform effectively. It also has a shorter braking distance on wet surfaces.

Because of its smaller contact patch, the Primacy 3 has a poorer contact with the road. Due to the presence of only a single rib, it loses the competition, forcing the tire to halt after a lengthy distance. On wet pavement, although it has multiple sipes, performs poorly owing to the lack of a larger contact patch with deep sipes, making it a tire with less dry and wet gripping.

Handling Comparison

The multi-pitch shoulder blocks on the Asymmetric provide for better handling in dry circumstances, while the numerous sipes located on the shoulder blocks help with steering on wet roads. It will complete a lap around a circular path in lesser time in both dry and wet conditions.

The Primacy 3 shoulder blocks have a shorter shoulder block length, which puts it at a significant disadvantage while turning on dry roads. However, its lateral grooves, which divide its shoulders into distinct blocks, are useful while turning on wet roads, but they can’t match its counterpart’s efficient sipes and longer pitch length. As a result, its lap time is longer on both dry and wet round tracks, placing it behind the other tire in terms of handling.

Comparison of Hydroplaning Resistance

Asymmetric narrower grooves make it unstable in extremely wet situations since the water can scarcely move through its tread due to its smaller and correspondingly shallower grooves, enhancing the risk of hydroplaning. As a result, this tire is not recommended to be used throughout the rainy season.

The Primary 3’s wider grooves enable it to efficiently sweep away the water, leading it to good grip owing to its tread’s ability to retain sufficient traction with flooded roads. As a result, its aquaplaning resistance is higher than the other tire.

Comparison of Rolling Resistance

The rolling resistance of a tire is a straightforward measurement of the friction that occurs between the tread and the road. To roll the tire on the road, this friction must be overcome. As a result, the higher the contact, the greater the rolling resistance. Similarly, moving the tire would need a higher amount of force. The Asymmetrical has higher contact patch which enhances its rolling resistance. Because more force is required to overcome friction and roll the tire, its fuel economy suffers, and the tire’s reputation suffers as a result.

 Because of Primacy 3’s lower contact, it has a reduced rolling resistance. As a result, less force is necessary to move this tire, resulting in lower gasoline usage.

Which tire is more comfortable?

Noise comfort and subjective comfort are the two categories of comfort. When it comes to noise comfort, the Asymmetric is substantially quieter on the road because of its smaller grooves, which leave less room for air particles to get lodged inside and cause noise. While its dry subjective comfort is greater due to superior stability and steering control on dry roads, it lacks wet subjective comfort due to its thin grooves being useless on wet roads, putting the driver in danger of hydroplaning.

The Primacy 3 noise comfort is substantially higher due to its larger grooves, which allow a greater number of air particles to become lodged inside its grooves which strike the groove’s walls and cause noise production. However, due to its lesser performance and control in dry circumstances, its dry subjective comfort is significantly lower, and its wet subjective comfort is significantly higher, because of its larger grooves preventing hydroplaning.

Durability and Treadwear Differences

The larger contact patch on the Asymmetric increases this tire’s rolling resistance, resulting in increased tread wear. It features twin steel belts reinforced by spirally wrapped polyamide cord cap plies, making this tire durable but not as durable as its rival. Because of the increased treadwear, this tire’s treadwear resistance is reduced, making it less durable and lowering mileage.

The Primacy 3 features a larger void ratio, which reduces the contact patch and hence the rolling resistance. This tire’s treadwear is reduced as a result of the lower rolling resistance. Its structure includes twin steel belts reinforced by size-optimized BAZ Technology (spirally-wrapped Polyamide Banded At Zero degrees to tire rotation), causing increased tread wear resistance and, as a result, a far more durable tire. The tire’s mileage is increased due to its increased durability and decreased treadwear.

Price Differences

Due to its strong dry and wet traction, the Asymmetric is a more expensive tire ranging from 143 to 268 USD. It features a softer rubber composition, which improves performance, but it also has a significant disadvantage in that it wears out quicker. Primacy 3, on the other hand, is a somewhat lower-priced tire in the range of 91 to 215 USD with a tougher rubber composition in the tread that delivers increased durability and mileage at the expense of performance. Customers can select one of these tires based on their preferences and desires.

Quick Summary

• Asymmetric is an ultra-high-performance all-season tire whereas Primacy 3 is a grand touring summer tire.
• Asymmetric can provide superb gripping on both dry and wet tracks.
• Because of its improved shoulder design, Asymmetrical has better dry and wet handling.
• Primacy 3 is the best option for dealing with extreme wet conditions and avoiding hydroplaning.
• Primacy 3 decreased rolling resistance along with a sturdy build allows for increased mileage.
• Asymmetric is quieter on roads, providing better dry subjective comfort, however, the wet subjective comfortableness of Primacy 3 is better.
• Asymmetric 5 is more expensive than its counterpart.