General Grabber ATX vs AT2 vs AT3: All three General Grabber ATX, AT2, and AT3 are all-terrain and all-season tires. And each of these tires are designed for specified purpose.
Here’s the main thing that you should know about these tires:
Examine the treads on these tires closely. They hold the key to knowing which to choose. In fact if you visit my "tread design" page, picking the right tire would never bother you.
These tires go up the ladder in their off-road competence in the following sequence; AT2 is the most competent, ATX is the second most effective, and AT3 is the least proficient.
On the other hand, In terms of on-road traction, their classification is converse. The AT3 comes on top, A/T X in the middle, and AT2 at the end.
Let’s see why its that so.
PS. Have you ever noticed that the Grabber ATX looks exactly like the BFG KO2?
Table of Contents
Comparing General Grabber ATX with General Grabber AT2
General Grabber ATX
General Grabber A/T2
Vs
Both the A/TX and the AT2 may seem very similar at first. But there’s a lot more going on than you think.
If you look close enough you’ll notice that the shoulders on both tires are very different.
The shoulders of AT2 have shorter tread blocks with more incisions on them and larger grooves. (This makes the AT2 more dedicated to soft surfaces).
On the other side, the Grabber ATX has serrated shoulders (with every other block with step). And comparatively, these shoulder blocks have a lot more void between them.
The Central Grabber ATX blocks are also slightly bulkier in comparison too.
And because of this, they have reduced grooves (and superior shoulders) which results in just a little bit bigger footprint.
This makes it more capable and withstanding on the road.
Compare Grabber ATX with other tires:
For better understanding, we also compared these tires with other famous All Terrain tires.
- With General Grabber X3 (which is a better tire for mud)
- With BFG KO2 (very similar traction is seen here)
- With Firestone Destination AT (on road traction is improved here)
- With Toyo AT3 (better tire for rocks)
- With Nitto Terra Grappler (Better off road traction)
- With Nitto Ridge Grappler (Hybrid tire, better overall experience)
- With Falken Wildpeak AT3w (better overall off road traction)
On-road Traction
A tire with a loftier footprint performs better on road in dry conditions.
The Grabber AT/X has a little bit more surface area than the AT2 that enables it to perform better on dry roads by the virtue of the increased rolling resistance.
Moreover, its grander shoulders give it improved on-road handling.
On the other hand, the AT2 has fairly larger grooves in the tread blocks and the shoulders.
This allows the tire to collect and dissipate water in its grooves to avoid hydroplaning and work exceptionally well on wet roads.
All and all, the AT/X shines brighter in the world of dry road traction, while the Grabber AT2 comes to life on wet roads.
Off-road Traction
Snow
Snow ratings are a must for a tire to perform a good job on the snow. Fortunately, both the AT/X and AT2 feature three-peak mountain snowflake ratings. The AT/X has comparatively smaller grooves than the AT2. Therefore, the AT2 can grab and throw soft snow with a greater ability than the AT/X and move across with greater efficiency.
Vice versa, the AT/X has a better grip on hard snow due to the supplementary contact zone on the snow.
What’s more, both of these tires have an additional option of metal studs to improve their snow traction.
Mud
The A/TX features decent grooves in its tread design that allow the tire to dig deep into the mud and execute a substantial self-cleaning ability to travel through the mud effectively.
Conversely, AT2 has bigger and better grooves in its tread design and extra sipes, with the addition of more scarce shoulders than the A/TX.
This permits the AT2 to perform a splendid job on the mud by the maximum self-cleaning ability produced by these features. Henceforth, the AT2 performs better on mud terrains.
Rocks and Gravel
A ruggedly fabricated tire has a better chance to survive on rugged terrains like rocks and gravel. The AT/X is built with a robust compound with the addition of Alternating shoulder scoops aided with stone bumpers and sidewall protection lugs. All of these combine forces to protect the tire from abrasions and provide additional grip on rugged terrains.
Likewise, the AT2 is built with a cut and chip resistance compound that makes it agile and sturdy to withstand rugged terrains. Furthermore, its shoulders lugs give it a moral hold on rocks and gravels. Consequently, both of these tires perform well on rugged terrains.
Tread-wear and Durability
The A/TX has a cut and chip-resistant tread compound embedded in its fabrication that works in conjunction with its newly added technologies. The StabiliTread Technology (Even tread wear) and Duragen Technology (ultra-high-strength steel belts, a robust, two-ply polyester casing) work together to give an all-out tread-wear and durability to the tire.
Similarly, the AT2 also features a cut and resistant tread compound and computer-optimized tread pattern that promotes uniform wear of the tire. In addition, its internal structure contains twin steel belts and a two-ply polyester cord body that aids in its durability. Nevertheless, the AT/X has higher rolling resistance than the AT2 because of its bigger footprint that increases its wear and tear. Therefore, the AT/X has reduced tread-wear.
ATX vs AT2 Summary
- The AT/X can perform a little bit better on the road in dry conditions than the AT2.
- The AT2 has a more trustworthy self-cleaning ability and off-road traction than the A/TX.
- Tread-wear of AT2 is a tiny bit healthier than the A/TX.
Comparing General Grabber AT2 with AT3
Vs
The AT2 and AT3 are also All-terrain tires, engineered to demonstrate on and off-road action. The AT2 has a broad tread design with wider grooves and more prominent sipes that makes it more suitable for off-roading and wet traction. While the AT3 has a compact tread design with narrow grooves that makes it better suited for on-road applications and dry conditions.
On-road Traction
When it comes to on-road traction in dry conditions, the AT3 has an advantage over the AT2. This is because of the closely placed blocks in its tread design that give it an enormous contact zone on the ground. It results in amplified rolling resistance and therefore provides a high-grade grip on the road.
In contrast, the AT2 has more scarcely placed tread blocks in its design, and therefore it has less surface, less rolling resistance, and less grip on dry roads than the AT3. Contrastively, due to its wider grooves, this tire has better water evacuating ability that makes it outstanding on wet roads.
Off-road Traction
The AT2 has larger grooves than the AT2, more sipes on the tread blocks, and lugged shoulders that allow it to shove the soft materials like mud and soft snow in its way with an excellent aptitude. Therefore, it has first-class traction on soft terrains like mud and soft snow. However, in the domain of hard snow, the AT3 outperforms the AT2 due to its massive tread blocks that give it gigantic biting power on hard surfaces. Both of the tires are tires have 3-peak snowflake ratings which makes them desirable in the winter.
Moving forward, both the AT2 and AT3 are vigorously built to withstand rugged terrains. The AT2 has a cut and chip resistance compound that works alongside its lugged shoulders to prevent damage to the tire from rocks and debris. Also, the AT3 is fabricated with a robust compound. It has large sidewall lugs and rim protection rib that shield that tire from sharp stones. In conclusion, both of these tires are well equipped to address rugged terrains.
Tread-wear and Durability
The AT2 features a cut and resistant tread compound and computer-optimized tread pattern that makes sure the tire has even tread-wear. In addition, its internal structure contains twin steel belts, and a two-ply polyester cord body further increases its endurance. It has a better economy due to a lower biting force.
On the flip side, the AT3 has a tread with robust compound and reinforced blocks that ensure a long tire life. In addition to that, it has ultra-strength steel belts that make this tire agile and durable. Its tread life is significantly reduced by the large footprint that gives it a high rolling resistance and requires more power to move on the road. Therefore AT3 is less economical than AT2.
AT2 vs AT3 summary
- The AT3 has superior on-road capabilities than the AT2.
- The AT2 shines brighter in the domain of off-roading.
- Both of these tires have agile and sturdy construction to tackle rugged terrains.
- The AT2 has better tread-wear than the AT3.
Compare Grabber AT2 with other tires:
For better understanding, we also compared these tires with other famous All Terrain tires.
- With General Grabber APT.
- With Toyo Open Country AT3.
- With Goodyear DuraTrac.
- With Firestone Destination AT.
- With BF Goodrich KO2.
- With Cooper Discoverer AT3.
Comparing General Grabber AT3 with A/TX
Vs
These tires are all-terrain all-season tires. The AT3 offers more promising traction on the road in dry conditions than the A/TX due to its compact tread design that helps it grip the road. Conversely, the AT3 has better traction on off-terrains and wet grounds due to bigger and better grooves and deeper sipes.
On-road Traction
In terms of on-road traction, the AT3 has superiority over the A/TX. The AT3 provides better connectivity with the ground due to its extensive footprint that gives it an amazing biting force on the ground. In wet conditions, the A/TX has the upper hand due to its widespread grooves and sipes that allow it to accumulate water in its treads and avoid hydroplaning to a greater level.
Off-road Traction
The AT/X has better overall off-road performance than the AT3. The AT/X features a 5-row symmetrical tread pattern with open channel grooves that empowers its traction on soft terrains. Whether it’s light snow or mud, these grooves provide the AT/X enough power to move across these materials due to their improved self-cleaning ability. Moreover, its alternating shoulder scoops enhances its soft-surface traction.
Moving onto rugged terrains, both the AT/X and AT3 possess the traits to tackle harsh terrains. AT/X is has a robust compound and Alternating shoulder scoops with stone bumpers and sidewall protection lugs to help it withstand impact from rocks and gravel. While the AT3 is made up of a robust compound, large sidewall lugs, and rim protection ribs that protect the tire from cuts and punchers in harsh conditions.
Tread-wear and Durability
The AT3 s built with a robust compound and reinforced blocks that improve its treadwear. The strength of the tire is further increased by the ultra-strength steel belts in its internal structure.
The A/TX is made from a cut and chip-resistant tread compound. Its StabiliTread Technology promotes even tread wear and Duragen Technology constituted from ultra-high-strength steel belts and a robust, two-ply polyester casing extends the tread-wear and endurance of the tire.
All and all, the tread-wear of A/TX is more dependable than the AT3 because it has lower rolling resistance, owing to its open tread pattern that allows less part of the tire to be in contact with the road and takes less power to move on the road. So, AT/X is more economical than AT3.
AT3 vs ATX summary
- The General Grabber AT3 has better on-road and dry traction than the A/TX.
- The A/TX is better suited to off-roading and wet surfaces.
- Both of the tires are vigorously built to withstand rugged terrains.
- Tread-wear of A/TX is better than the AT3.
Compare Grabber AT3 with other tires:
For better understanding, we also compared these tires with other famous All Terrain tires.
- Yokohama Geolandar G015.
- Toyo AT3.
- BF Goodrich Ko2.
- Pirelli Scorpion AT Plus.
- Cooper Discoverer AT3.
- Goodyear Wrangler DuraTrac.
