BFG KO2 vs Goodyear MTR

Goodyear MTR and BFGoodrich KO2 both being All-Terrain tires give a decent performance in every condition. Both tires are highly specialized to satisfy their users on different surfaces.

MTR features wider grooves, so, it performs better on rough uneven paths whereas the contact patch of KO2 is comparatively higher, giving a better on-road performance.

Comparing Both Tires

MTR follows an asymmetric 4 pitch tread design with a higher void ratio. However, one of the center block columns offers closely packed tread blocks with a lower void ratio. This tire features an open shoulder design with highly efficient sipes over the tread blocks.

Tread of MTR
Tread pattern of MTR

The rugged sidewalls of this tire are strengthened by Kevlar. The stone ejectors between the grooves are highly optimized. Moreover, this tire also features traction ridges and hardworking wraparound tread. 

KO2 emphasizes an aggressive 5-pitch tread design with a comparatively lower void ratio. The sipes of this tire are shallower and shoulders are barely opened. The stone ejectors of this tire are not much efficient; however, the 3 ply polyester sidewalls follow a robust tread design.

BF Goodrich KO2 tread
Tread pattern of ko2

This tire uses Max CoreGuard technology and offers 2 steel belts with a nylon blend. Moreover, the tread blocks are interlocked with staggered shoulders.

On-Road Traction Comparison

MTR offers broader grooves with a lower contact patch and reduced tire grip. So, the higher void ratio of this tire affects its performance on dry paved surfaces. However, in wet situations, the widely spaced grooves along with full-depth sipes bring sensational performance as they wipe away water efficiently and reduce the risk of hydroplaning.

BF Goodrich KO2 black helix

KO2 possesses a lower void ratio with a greater contact patch and increased tire grip, which lowers the braking distance and allows this tire to perform greatly on smooth dry roads. However, the closely packed tread blocks and shallower sipes are less effective in wiping away water, making this tire more slippery and at a greater risk of hydroplaning.

Off-Road Traction Comparison

KO2 off roading in mud

Mud Terrain

The wider grooves of MTR enable it to cope with extreme muddy conditions as they provide several biting edges which effectively grab mud and throws it back to aid the forward movement of the tire. Moreover, the open shoulders of this tire keep the sidewall clean as they allow the mud to pass smoothly through them.

KO2 comes with narrower grooves which affect its efficiency on mud terrain. The mud may get stuck into the barely spaced grooves and result in the loss of traction. So, this tire is less effective in catching and throwing back mud as compared to its counterpart. Moreover, the shoulder studs also lack in their function as they do not allow the easy passing of mud through them.

Snow Terrain

The widely spaced grooves of MTR, just like on mud, give maximum traction on soft snow as they effectively bite snow and throw it backwards, resulting in effective movement of the tire. However, this tire has a lower contact patch and reduced tire grip, so, it struggles on icy roads. The reduced traction of this tire makes it more slippery on ice terrain, therefore, this tire is not a decent choice in such conditions.

KO2 featuring narrower grooves is not much favorable option on soft snow. The grooves of this tire do not permit it to efficiently grab and throw back soft snow, so, this tire is not a favorable choice in such circumstances. However, on ice, the greater contact patch grants it a strong grip, allowing the tire to undergo such severe conditions quite easily.

Rock Terrain

The broader grooves of MTR grant it an efficient grip on rocky paths. They give it an edge to overcome tough rocky conditions. Also, the stone ejectors are highly optimized to block the entry of stone/pebbles into the grooves. If not hindered they can penetrate through the tire and puncture it. Moreover, this tire offers wraparound tread which protects it from unusual rock damage.

KO2 highlights a lower void ratio which reduces its grip on rocks. The narrower grooves of this tire may catch small stones into them and result in reducing its efficiency on rocky terrain. Its stone ejectors are less optimized and lack in preventing small stones from getting stuck into its grooves. So, this tire is not as good as its counterpart on rocky terrain.

Durability and Treadwear Difference

MTR having a higher void ratio has a smaller contact patch with the road. It offers lower rolling resistance and treadwear. So, this tire is more durable as compared to its competitor. Moreover, the sidewalls of MTR follow 3 ply construction and are reinforced by Kevlar® which strengthens them and promotes puncture resistance. Also, an active wraparound tread guards the tire against chip and cuts, that may be offered by the sharp-edged rocks.

KO2 follows an innovative tread design that allows it to create a balance between its rigidity and elasticity. Featuring a higher void ratio and greater contact patch with the ground this tire is not much favorable in the case of its durability and stability. Its higher rolling resistance exposes it to higher treadwear which reduces its durability. However, this tire also features 3 ply polyester cord sidewalls and 2 steel belts with nylon which makes it resistant to chips and cuts up to some extent.

Which Tire is more Comfortable?

MTR lacks in the case of on-road comfort as it features wider grooves which allow a large number of air particles to get trapped into them. These air particles collide with the walls of the grooves, producing a loud noise, and contribute to reducing the overall comfort of the tire. The same wider grooves are proved effective in providing a much comfortable ride off-road as they act as shock absorbers in such conditions. They lessen the impact of jerks and make the tire more reliable.

KO2 features a lower void ratio and greater contact patch with the road, allowing a limited amount of air particles to get trapped into the grooves and lowering the noise when they strike the walls of the grooves. Moreover, the lesser braking distance contributes to increase the on-road comfort of this tire. However, in the case of off-road comfort, the narrower grooves result in a bumpy ride as they lack in damping the impact of jerks. Therefore, this tire is not much reliable on rough unpaved paths.

Differences in Price

MTR is higher priced because it offers great traction on unpaved paths and is also much reliable on paved roads. Moreover, it also has a stronger built which contributes to its higher price.

Quick Summary

  • Both tires are categorized as All-Terrain.
  • On dry paved paths, KO2 is a better option due to its greater contact patch.
  • In mud, MTR performs better because it has wider grooves and highly optimized shoulder lugs.
  • On soft snow, MTR again leads KO2 due to its wider grooves.
  • In the ice, KO2 is a better choice due to its stronger grip.
  • On rocks, MTR featuring bolder stone ejectors and wider grooves performs better.
  • MTR is more durable due to its stronger built.
  • KO2 is a more comfortable tire on-road whereas MTR is a more comfortable tire off-road.